Blog

If your company is already at seven figures and you feel like your tech stack is on fire, the short answer is this: you need clean books, the right entity structure, smart use of credits, and a clear plan for how your tech spending shows up on your tax return. That is what actually reduces the tax bill, not another tool or dashboard. If you are looking for targeted help, firms that focus on Tax planning for seven-figure businesses needing urgent help can plug into your numbers fast and give you a path that is grounded in the tax code, not guesswork.

Now let us slow down and walk through how that works in real life, especially for owners in manufacturing and tech focused operations. Because once your revenue hits seven figures, random tax tips from social media or a friendly bookkeeper are not enough. They can even be harmful.

Why seven-figure businesses feel tax pressure so sharply

When a business crosses into seven-figure revenue, the tax bill stops feeling like a line item. It feels like a second, silent partner that takes money without doing any work.

There are a few reasons this hits harder for tech heavy and manufacturing focused businesses:

• Your spend on equipment, software, and automation is large and ongoing.
• You probably run on thin margins on some product lines.
• You are pushed to grow fast, which means cash is tight even if revenue looks strong.
• Your accounting is usually patched together around growth, not built for tax planning.

I have seen owners in precision machining, hardware startups, and software driven logistics all say the same thing in different words: “We are busy building. Taxes are something we react to once a year.” That pattern works at low revenue. At seven figures, it becomes expensive.

For a seven-figure business, tax planning is not about clever tricks. It is about making your existing decisions more tax aware.

So instead of chasing exotic strategies, it often makes more sense to fix the boring, unglamorous stuff you already touch every day.

Start with the foundation: clean numbers and clear categories

I know this sounds dull. It is also where most of the money is lost.

If your tech stack is messy, your tax planning usually is too. When you run multiple systems that do not quite match, you end up with:

• Misclassified expenses
• Equipment recorded as “supplies” or “software” that never gets depreciated correctly
• Contractor vs employee confusion
• Personal expenses quietly buried in business cards

None of this feels dramatic. But each issue blocks a real tax choice you could be making.

Map your tech and financial systems

If your business leans on tech, you probably have a mix like this:

• Accounting software
• Manufacturing ERP or MRP
• Inventory tools or spreadsheets
• Project management and time tracking
• Payment processors
• Ecommerce or order management

When these systems do not talk to each other well, it becomes hard to prove what is R&D, what is cost of goods sold, what is capital equipment, and what is overhead. The tax code treats each of those differently.

A simple table like the one below can help you and your CPA see where the friction really is.

System	Primary use	Feeds into	Tax impact if wrong
Accounting software	Books and financial reports	Tax return, bank reports	Wrong categories, lost deductions, messy audits
ERP / MRP	Production, inventory, WIP	COGS, fixed assets	Incorrect COGS, inaccurate margins, overpaid taxes
Time tracking / project tools	Engineering and dev time	R&D studies, job costing	Missed R&D credits and wrong labor allocation
Payment processor	Customer payments	Revenue recognition	Income misstatement and sales tax confusion

If you cannot clearly show how a dollar flows from quote to cash to tax return, you are probably giving up tax savings without realizing it.

Before you look for advanced tax moves, make sure your systems actually tell a consistent story about how you earn and spend money.

Entity structure: is your current setup still right at seven figures?

A lot of owners start as an LLC taxed as a sole proprietorship or partnership. That is simple. It is also often expensive once income rises.

For manufacturing and tech focused companies, I tend to see three common setups:

• Single member LLC taxed as sole proprietorship
• Multi member LLC taxed as partnership
• S Corporation or LLC taxed as S Corporation

C Corporations appear often in venture backed tech startups, but for owner led seven figure businesses, S Corporations and LLCs carry most of the weight.

S Corporation basics for high income owners

An S Corporation can reduce self employment taxes by splitting profit into:

• Reasonable salary, subject to payroll taxes
• Distributions, not subject to self employment taxes

That sounds simple. It is not always simple in practice, because “reasonable salary” is not a fixed number. For a software company founder writing core code, 90% of profit as salary might be reasonable. For an owner of a mature manufacturing plant that has managers in place, something very different might make sense.

The goal is not to push salary as low as possible. The goal is to set a salary you can defend, while still taking advantage of the S Corporation structure.

This is where urgent, last minute planning often goes wrong. Owners try to “fix” the year by slashing salary at the end. That move, done hastily, can draw more attention than it saves.

When a C Corporation is not crazy

There is a kind of group thinking that says “C Corporations are only for VC backed software startups.” That is not completely accurate.

Flat corporate tax rates and the possibility of Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) treatment can sometimes help if you plan to sell in the future, keep profits inside the company, or reinvest heavily in growth. Some manufacturing firms with big capex cycles fall in this category. Some do not. The details matter.

I think the real question is simpler: does your current structure match your profit level and exit goals. If not, no clever deduction can fully fix that mismatch.

Tech spending: expense or capitalize?

This is where tech heavy and manufacturing firms often leave serious money on the table, partly because the rules feel murky and partly because the accounting system is not set up for clear tracking.

Think about the kind of tech spending you have:

• Software subscriptions
• Internally developed software
• Production equipment with embedded software
• Automation, robotics, and sensors
• Cloud hosting and platforms

Some of this you can expense in the year you pay. Some needs to be capitalized and depreciated or amortized over time. In manufacturing, this often mixes with Section 179 and bonus depreciation rules, which have shifted several times over the last few years.

A simple comparison

Type of spend	Common treatment	Risk if handled casually
Standard SaaS tools	Expensed as operating cost	Usually low risk, but can hide R&D related work
Custom internal software	Some cost capitalized, some expensed	Overly aggressive expensing or missed amortization
Automation equipment	Capitalized, with Section 179 / bonus options	Wrong life, missed bonus, or incorrect expensing
Cloud infrastructure	Usually expensed, but context matters	Poor tracking by project, lost tax credit support

The tax impact is not only about this year. Once you choose a method, you carry it forward, and that choice affects cash flow for years. Many owners only see the short term angle. They want the biggest deduction now. Sometimes that is fine. Other times it leaves them with thin deductions later, when profit is higher and they need shelter more.

R&D credits for real world manufacturing and tech work

Some owners hear “R&D” and think of white lab coats and patents. That view is narrow. In many manufacturing and tech led shops, what you already do daily might qualify.

Here are examples that often count:

• Improving a production process to reduce scrap or speed up cycle time
• Developing new product lines or new materials
• Custom software that controls equipment or handles complex routing
• Tuning robotics cells or PLCs to handle new parts

The key tests involve technical uncertainty, a process of experimentation, and reliance on some form of engineering or science. That sounds formal. In practice, it often describes exactly what your engineers and process techs already do.

The problem is not that companies lack qualifying work. The problem is that they do not track it in a way that a tax authority would believe. Time sheets are vague. Project descriptions are scattered in email or in Jira boards that no one wants to clean up.

If your people solve technical problems step by step, there is a good chance some of that work could support R&D credits, if you track it properly.

Connecting your tech tools to R&D tracking

This is where your tech stack can help instead of getting in the way. You probably already use tools to manage tickets, sprints, engineering changes, or process improvements. With a bit of thought, you can create tags, project codes, or categories that flag potential R&D work as it happens.

Examples:

• Tag software tickets as “experimental” when they touch unproven solutions
• Add a “process improvement” code in your ERP routing when you test new methods
• Log engineering change orders in a consistent format that notes testing and uncertainty

Over time, this builds a record that supports R&D credit claims. It also gives you a cleaner picture of where your engineering time actually goes.

Manufacturing, inventory, and the tax side of physical work

Tech talk often leans toward software. For a lot of readers here, the real work shows up in machines, raw materials, and finished goods sitting on shelves. That is where tax planning can either reflect reality or distort it badly.

Cost of goods sold and tax

If your books treat too much as overhead instead of cost of goods sold, your gross margin looks worse than it really is. That by itself does not change total taxable income, but it can affect decisions about pricing, product lines, and even bank covenants. And if materials, direct labor, or machine time are misclassified, you might also misapply inventory rules for tax.

Some manufacturing firms now rely heavily on automation, sensors, and software driven tools. The cost of that tech usually splits across:

• Upfront equipment cost
• Ongoing support and software
• Custom integration and engineering

Different parts of that mix belong in different spots on your tax return. Lumping them together leaves you with fewer planning options.

Compensation planning for owners and key people in tech heavy firms

Once you reach seven figures, how you pay yourself and your key people becomes a tax planning lever, not just an HR topic.

There are a few levers that tend to matter:

• Owner salary vs distributions (for S Corporations)
• Bonuses timed near year end
• Equity or phantom equity in tech or IP heavy companies
• Retirement plans tailored to high earners

Retirement plans are often underused

Many owners stick with a basic 401(k), sometimes with a simple match. For businesses with few employees or a clear split between higher and lower earners, that might miss an opportunity.

Plans such as cash balance pensions or carefully designed profit sharing formulas can shift more pre tax dollars to owners and key engineers, without ignoring other staff. The setup takes more thought and some testing, but at seven figures of revenue and solid profit, it can move real numbers.

I know some owners hesitate because they do not want extra complexity. That is fair. More complex plans need maintenance. But if you are already spending thousands each year on tools and subscriptions that barely get used, it might be reasonable to invest in a structure that reduces tax for years.

Urgent vs strategic tax planning: what to do when you are late

Sometimes you are reading this and your year end is close. The books are behind. Profit is higher than expected. Your tech projects are mid flight. You feel late. That happens more often than people admit.

In that situation, you have two tracks:

• Short term moves that can affect this year
• Longer term fixes so you are not in the same spot next year

Short term levers that still matter

When time is short, your options narrow, but you still have a few that can be meaningful:

• Review large equipment and tech purchases to confirm correct depreciation and Section 179 choices
• Check that all valid expenses are captured, especially in online tools or cards rarely reviewed
• Evaluate bonus timing if you were going to pay them soon anyway
• Confirm that owner salary levels match your S Corporation plan for the year, not just habit

These are not dramatic. They will not erase a tax bill. They can still move five or six figures of taxable income in some cases, which matters.

Longer term fixes that rely on tech clean up

When you look beyond this year, tax planning for a tech heavy or manufacturing business is really a systems problem. You want your tools to collect the right details as a normal part of work, not as an extra chore.

Areas where a small change helps a lot:

• Standard project naming and coding for engineering and dev work
• Clear rules for what gets capitalized vs expensed in your accounting system
• Regular closing routines every month, not once a year
• Basic dashboards that show profit by product or line, not just at company level

A surprise tax bill is usually a symptom of surprising profits that no one tracked in real time. Your tech tools should make those numbers visible enough that tax planning conversations can happen in the middle of the year, not only in the last week.

Common mistakes seven-figure tech and manufacturing businesses make on taxes

I will list a few patterns I keep seeing. You might find yourself in one or two of them.

• Running everything through one credit card and guessing categories later
• Letting engineers and IT sign contracts without any accounting rules attached
• Using “catch up” tax planning every few years instead of a steady rhythm
• Copying a friend or advisor’s structure without checking if your numbers match theirs
• Assuming R&D credits are only for big companies or formal labs
• Never reviewing entity structure once revenue grew beyond the early stage

Some of these are understandable. You are busy making products or shipping features. Tax planning feels secondary. Still, if you add up the cost over five or ten years, the number can be uncomfortable.

How manufacturing and tech decisions quietly shape your tax bill

Every big move you make on the factory floor or in your code base has a tax side, even if no one mentions it.

• Buying a new CNC cell or robot
• Moving from on premise servers to the cloud
• Building an internal tool instead of buying one
• Changing your mix of contractors and employees
• Opening a new facility in another state

Each decision affects depreciation, credits, payroll taxes, state filings, and more. None of that should drive your business decisions completely. That would be foolish. But it should be in the conversation early, not as an afterthought.

If you are signing a tech or equipment agreement that you expect to live with for years, your tax advisor should see it before you sign, not after year end.

Some owners worry that this slows them down. That can happen if the advisor is slow or only thinks about compliance. A good one in this field will focus on shaping the decision, not stopping it.

Bringing it all together for a seven-figure, tech heavy operation

By this point, you may feel that tax planning touches almost everything. That is actually close to the truth once your business is large enough.

For a manufacturing or tech centric company at seven figures, the practical path tends to look like this:

1. Clean your data so your financials match your actual work.
2. Review entity structure with current and future profit in mind.
3. Set clear rules for tech spend: what is capital, what is expense, what is potential R&D.
4. Align your engineering and production systems with simple tags that support tax credits and cost tracking.
5. Revisit compensation and retirement planning once profits stabilize at a higher level.
6. Build a yearly rhythm where tax talks happen while you still have time to act.

None of this is dramatic. You will not see a viral chart from it. But over time, it keeps more cash inside your company, where you can buy better machines, hire better people, or build better products.

Questions owners often ask when they finally stop treating tax as an afterthought

Q: Is it worth changing my entity at this stage, or is it too late?

It is rarely “too late”, but the gains depend on your profit level, payroll, and plans. For a company with steady mid to high six figure profit, moving to or refining an S Corporation setup can be meaningful. For a business with complex ownership or plans to seek outside capital, the answer might be different. You need numbers, not guesses, to judge it.

Q: My accounting is messy. Should I fix that first or look for tax savings now?

You probably have to do both, but cleaning the books is the base. Without solid numbers, any tax plan is just theory. Often, while fixing past periods, a good CPA will still spot quick corrections you can apply this year so you are not waiting forever to see a benefit.

Q: Are R&D credits really worth the hassle for a smaller seven-figure business?

Sometimes yes, sometimes no. If you have a few engineers or developers spending most of their time on new products or process improvements, the credits can add up quickly. If all your work is repeat, with no real testing or problem solving, then the claim might be weak. The key is to walk through your actual projects and see how they match the rules, not to accept a blanket answer from someone selling a package.

Q: Why does my advisor keep asking about my software stack and shop floor tools?

Because these tools control how your data is created and stored. They shape how your costs are grouped, what can be supported in an audit, and which credits you can claim. For a tech driven or manufacturing business, ignoring the systems is the same as ignoring the numbers.

Q: If I had to fix only one thing this year, what should it be?

For most seven-figure businesses in tech or manufacturing, I would start with making sure your books are closed monthly, with clear categories for tech, equipment, labor, and projects. Once that works, every other tax planning idea becomes easier and safer to apply.